Available on Youtube

A Comparative Exploration of Suffering and Revenge in "A Dinner Appointment" and "Dogville"
Both A Dinner Date (1981) and Dogville (2003) explore themes of suffering, injustice, and the eventual pursuit of revenge. Although they come from different cultural contexts and employ distinct narrative styles, both films present powerful meditations on human endurance, the oppressive weight of pain, and the ultimate act of retribution in the face of betrayal. These shared themes invite an examination of how both protagonists—Nawal in A Dinner Appointment and Grace in Dogville—navigate a path from enduring suffering to enacting revenge, shedding light on the emotional toll of injustice.
Suffering and Injustice: The Beginning of Transformation
In A Dinner Date, Nawal’s (Souad Hosni) suffering stems from emotional and physical neglect at the hands of her husband, Ezzat (Hussein Fahmy). Her marriage is defined by his indifference and exploitation, leaving Nawal isolated and yearning for connection. When she embarks on an affair with Shukri (Ahmed Zaki), her emotional fulfillment is short-lived as Ezzat escalates his violent efforts to control her, ultimately killing Shukri. This event becomes the catalyst for her transformation from a passive victim to an active agent of vengeance.
Similarly, in Dogville, Grace’s (Nicole Kidman) suffering begins when she seeks refuge in the small town of Dogville, only to find that the kindness of the townspeople comes at a steep price. Initially welcomed, Grace agrees to perform labor in exchange for protection, but as time goes on, the town’s façade of morality crumbles. What starts as an agreement based on mutual assistance turns into a system of abuse, as Grace is sexually harassed, manipulated, and ultimately enslaved by the townspeople. Like Nawal, Grace's suffering pushes her toward a drastic shift in her identity—transforming from a passive victim to an agent of ultimate retribution.
In both films, the protagonists endure pain as a result of their external circumstances. However, the key difference lies in the intensity and public nature of their suffering: Nawal’s pain is more personal, internal, and isolated within the domestic sphere, while Grace's suffering is a more communal and public experience within Dogville, exposing the collective moral decay of the community.
The Growing Resilience in the Face of Pain
As both women endure their respective torments, they also grow in resilience. Nawal’s transformation is seen in her decision to take control of her fate. After Shukri’s death, she plots her revenge with careful deliberation, inviting Ezzat to dinner and poisoning him with his favorite dish. Her resilience is expressed in her final act of reclaiming power over her abuser, one meal at a time.
In Dogville, Grace’s resilience builds incrementally. At first, she tries to maintain her dignity and continue doing good despite the increasingly cruel treatment from the townspeople. Her internal strength allows her to endure the suffering, but she gradually comes to the realization that her compassion has been exploited to the point of complete degradation. Grace's decision to finally seek revenge is born out of a sense of moral awakening; she has been pushed to her limits and sees no other option but to destroy the town that has stripped her of her humanity.
Both Nawal and Grace demonstrate emotional resilience by enduring unimaginable pain, only to later confront their abusers in calculated, methodical ways. In Nawal’s case, the revenge is personal—an intimate act that concludes her journey of emotional healing. For Grace, her revenge is both personal and communal, as she seeks to punish the collective force that has oppressed her.
Revenge: The Culmination of Suffering
In both films, the act of revenge is the ultimate resolution of prolonged suffering. In A Dinner Date, Nawal’s revenge is deeply personal and symbolic. She poisons Ezzat’s favorite dish as a way to reclaim control over her life, making him experience the same helplessness and suffering she has endured. The act of cooking his last meal—a meal he has enjoyed and taken for granted—becomes the final moment of her empowerment.
For Grace in Dogville, the revenge is more grandiose and violent, stemming from her realization of the town’s inherent corruption. When Grace calls upon the mobsters, she demands the destruction of Dogville itself, condemning its residents to death. Unlike Nawal, whose revenge is a singular, intimate moment, Grace’s vengeance is collective and irreversible, wiping out the entire town in a display of overwhelming power. Her final act—ordering Tom’s execution and sparing only the dog Moses—represents the eradication of the town’s moral hypocrisy and serves as a brutal form of justice for the way she was treated.
Both acts of revenge are a culmination of the pain and injustice endured by the women. However, the nature of the revenge differs: Nawal’s revenge is personal, direct, and private, serving as a closing chapter to her suffering, while Grace’s revenge is a public, destructive force, aimed at exposing the moral corruption of an entire community.
Themes of Moral Corruption and Redemption
Both films critique moral corruption, but they do so in distinct ways. In A Dinner Date, the moral corruption is primarily embodied in Ezzat, whose disregard for Nawal’s emotional needs leads to her suffering. Ezzat's actions push Nawal to the brink, and her revenge, while cathartic, serves as a form of justice for his cruelty.
In Dogville, the moral decay is more pervasive, reflected in the collective failure of the town’s residents. While individuals like Tom are initially portrayed as morally idealistic, the town’s façade quickly disintegrates, revealing how each person contributes to Grace’s suffering. Grace’s revenge, then, is not just about avenging her own torment; it is about confronting and dismantling the hypocrisy of a community that has allowed itself to devolve into exploitation. 
The Price of Revenge
Both A Dinner Date and Dogville feature women who endure suffering, navigate the complexities of emotional pain, and ultimately seek revenge as a form of redemption. While Nawal’s revenge is personal, intimate, and emotionally satisfying, Grace’s revenge is brutal, public, and sweeping, underscoring the broader social critique inherent in Dogville. The shared themes of resilience, pain, injustice, and revenge highlight the deeply transformative journey of both women, who use their suffering not only to regain control over their own lives but also to expose and dismantle the systems of oppression that have shaped their experiences. 

You may also like

Back to Top